The most expensive decision in a food project is usually made before anyone draws anything: signing a lease on the wrong space.
We have reviewed spaces that looked perfect and were not. A unit with no gas service on a menu that needs a six-burner range. A second-floor bakery with no freight access for a deck oven. A location zoned for retail where a restaurant requires a change-of-use application nobody budgeted eight weeks for. A landlord’s base building that provides 200 amps where the equipment list needs 400.
Each of those is survivable if you find it in week one. Each of them is a five-figure problem if you find it in week twelve.
What this stage actually produces
You get a written assessment of whether the concept works in that space, at that budget, on that timeline. Not a sales document — an honest read, including the version where the answer is no.
If the answer is yes, you get the numbers to move on: a preliminary budget broken into design, permits, construction, equipment and contingency, and a schedule with the permitting window sized to the actual municipality rather than a generic estimate.
Sizing the equipment to the menu, not the room
A recurring mistake is buying a kitchen for the menu you might have in three years. It inflates the equipment package, inflates the electrical and gas service, inflates the hood and make-up air, and inflates the rent you need to cover.
We work backwards from the menu and the covers you actually expect. That usually produces a smaller, cheaper, faster kitchen than the one the operator walked in imagining, and it leaves capacity in the panel for the expansion if it comes.
The consultation is free
The first conversation costs nothing and includes a project review, a timeline estimate and a preliminary cost breakdown. If the project is not viable, we would rather tell you in an hour than bill you for six weeks of drawings first.


